Hey Vince!! Nice pics of the malibu, so you’re in memphis. have any of their ribs? i hear they’re world famous for them!
I was an idiot and didn’t try the ribs.. And I didn’t try their “Big ass beer” either…. (I should have) And yes, Mr Burlapp is camera shy.I think the cars are the focus, not me. Maybe one day….
Hi Vince.. that’s good pics, i never going there. may be someday 🙂
why don’t you take some pictures of the back? maybe cause the taillights look terrible?
I was in Memphis last spring….My dad makes better ribs.
That rear end still seems a little plain…
the car is awefull to me ! if chevy told us in 1988 that this is the car for 2008 i would have said a big yawn ! after all this is the car chevy was showing off in 1988 ..
“…after all this is the car chevy was showing off in 1988…”
Uh huh, sure. Which one would that be exactly?
Uh huh, sure. Which one would that be exactly?
It was called the chevy venture of the 1987-1988 auto show season look it up !!!
“It was called the chevy venture of the 1987-1988 auto show season look it up !!!”
Of course some complain-ey people need to dig really deep to validate their opinions. This car looks more modern than any of its competitors. If you think this looks like a 20 year old design, I’m willing to bet that most people with an IQ above 170 will disagree.
My IQ is over 170; and I disagree. Looks more like the VW Pheaton than any show car from the past. (I’d actually pay more for this style than I would have for a Pheaton — if only it had all the standard amenities: Nav, distronic, sunroof, super-adjustable seats, etc.
The rear window does look strikingly similar to the Phaeton. Actually, it’s a similar design element as the C pillar from the accord, but executed better on the Malibu.
Burlapp must be camera shy in front of his fans.
Hey Vince!!
Nice pics of the malibu, so you’re in memphis. have any of their ribs? i hear they’re world famous for them!
I was an idiot and didn’t try the ribs..
And I didn’t try their “Big ass beer” either….
(I should have)
And yes, Mr Burlapp is camera shy.I think the cars are the focus, not me.
Maybe one day….
Hi Vince..
that’s good pics, i never going there. may be someday 🙂
why don’t you take some pictures of the back? maybe cause the taillights look terrible?
I was in Memphis last spring….My dad makes better ribs.
That rear end still seems a little plain…
the car is awefull to me ! if chevy told us in 1988 that this is the car for 2008 i would have said a big yawn ! after all this is the car chevy was showing off in 1988 ..
“…after all this is the car chevy was showing off in 1988…”
Uh huh, sure. Which one would that be exactly?
Uh huh, sure. Which one would that be exactly?
It was called the chevy venture of the 1987-1988 auto show season look it up !!!
“It was called the chevy venture of the 1987-1988 auto show season look it up !!!”
Of course some complain-ey people need to dig really deep to validate their opinions. This car looks more modern than any of its competitors. If you think this looks like a 20 year old design, I’m willing to bet that most people with an IQ above 170 will disagree.
My IQ is over 170; and I disagree. Looks more like the VW Pheaton than any show car from the past. (I’d actually pay more for this style than I would have for a Pheaton — if only it had all the standard amenities: Nav, distronic, sunroof, super-adjustable seats, etc.
The rear window does look strikingly similar to the Phaeton. Actually, it’s a similar design element as the C pillar from the accord, but executed better on the Malibu.