2010 Mercury Milan Hybrid

Last Updated:



I always liked the Milan.
Sure, it’s just a Fusion with different trim. Just like what they used to do in the 70’s.
But it is still a really nice looking car.
The new “revised” one also looks really good.

I just hope they will push the Hybrid version. The specs seem superior to the Camry, and it looks better.
Mercury is supposed to be getting cars “designed and engineered by Ford Europe” within a couple of years.
Whatever that means.

At least it looks like they aren’t going to kill the brand after all..
That’s a great move.

Conversation 15 comments

  1. I like the look of the old Milan better. It’s funny….before I liked the Milan much better than the Fusion. Now I like the new Fusion better than the Milan. I see the appeal of the Milans new front end but I don’t like it. Overall though, good job to Ford, especially for the hybrids. Too bad though that Ford was’nt able to get direct injection into their new engines. Chevy just released some details on their new 3.0l DI V6 and it looks tough to beat for now.

  2. I like the look of the old Milan better. It’s funny….before I liked the Milan much better than the Fusion. Now I like the new Fusion better than the Milan. I see the appeal of the Milans new front end but I don’t like it. Overall though, good job to Ford, especially for the hybrids. Too bad though that Ford was’nt able to get direct injection into their new engines. Chevy just released some details on their new 3.0l DI V6 and it looks tough to beat for now.

  3. You know … Ford and GM still don’t seem to understand the do-or-die thing. 2 years is a ‘life-time’ in term of automotive years. they already have great vehicles in europe and asia, why not spend the monies to federalize them and bring it in by summer ’09.

    my hard earn money is going to another bail-out and this one is not recoup-able.

  4. The front of this car is utterly hideous.

    I expect disgusting designs from Honda/Acura. Nothing about that front end is cohesive with the remainder of the vehicle’s styling. Thumbs down on this … and I also thought the old Milan was very nice.

  5. I have the curren Milan, and won’t be trading it in for this one. I don’t care for what they did to the Fusion either. Too bad, they really happen to be decent cars.

  6. For some reason it looks as if it borrowed the front end of the Montego, just how it borrowed the front end from the original Milan. That air damn bothers me because it reminds me of a Pruis. The tail lights look backwards too. It looks like these should have been the originala tails and the first Milan recived the “revised” tails.

  7. it looks like a SEAT from behind! And yes, the SEAT had those rear lamps many years before this car came out!

  8. Actually the front of this car looks like it has down syndrome and the rear seems to be the same, as are the side views, BIG YAWN !!! all this we waited 4 years for ?? the fusion also looks just a tad odd to me also ! remember good design and odd design cost the same !

  9. Certainly not a bad car, but who needs it? Mercury is dead and Ford should bury the corpse.

    This car and the Ford Fusion are Mazda 6 cars in drag–and not even the latest Mazdas now. So why would anybody buy this thing?

    Ford, Chrysler, and GM are dead meat. Too bad, but the truth.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *