burlapp car

2010 Cadillac SRX Price

By  •  Published:  •  Last updated:


The all new SRX will start at $34 155 for the 3.0 Liter V6 with Front wheel drive.
This is about $6000 less than the model it replaces.
But for a while, the new SRX was going to be called something else and sold as a cheaper car than the existing SRX. So it was designed and engineered from the beginning to be cheaper.
So no big surprise there.

But no matter what, It is still cost less than most of its competition, a good move from GM.

Conversation 13 comments

  1. Nice looking exterior. I have to see the interior to give my final opinion but so far a ‘thumb up.’

  2. Wow….Finally a nice Lux companion to the Equinox and the pricing makes sense. I can see them selling a ton of these…which would probably out sell the CTS Wagon (Which no one besides Europe really wants anyway and the OLD SRX was technically already filling this gap since is was a CTS Wagon in the first place).

  3. Not much of a GM fan since it is nationalized now, but I like this. I hope the optioning is not like the CTS, however.

    With the CTS they basically sell you vinyl (pleather) seats with the base car, and leather is an add on. I think leather should be the base personally, but if not gimme decent good-quality attractive tight cloth seats. Other thing with the CTS is that the base is like buying a stripped car – you have to drop 7k in options to make it livable. I expect a lux car to be very livable in its base form, and the options just make it that much more nice.

  5. I hope the base price comes with a loaded car. It is pathetic to price additional options and get nickeled and dimed all the way to $45k. Acura has the best pricing structure when it comes to luxury brands.

  6. “This is about $6000 less than the model it replaces.” — and it looks it. It now has the disproportionate ugliness that Lexus RS owners seem to crave. –Count me out.

  7. This is about $6000 less than the model it replaces. — and it looks it. But probably has the requesit disproportonate ugliness that Lexus RS owners seem to crave. -Count me out.

  8. Anonymous said…
    “This is about $6000 less than the model it replaces. — and it looks it. But probably has the requesit disproportonate ugliness that Lexus RS owners seem to crave. -Count me out.”

    May 27, 2009 3:24 PM

    Well the Lexus RX is a huge selling vehicle so maybe they are on to something.

  9. "Anonymous said…
    With the CTS they basically sell you vinyl (pleather) seats with the base car, and leather is an add on. I think leather should be the base personally, but if not gimme decent good-quality attractive tight cloth seats. Other thing with the CTS is that the base is like buying a stripped car – you have to drop 7k in options to make it livable. I expect a lux car to be very livable in its base form, and the options just make it that much more nice."

    Ummm, please price an A4, 3 Series, C Class. They all come with leatherette on the base models. It makes sense.

    "Anonymous said…
    You couldn't give me a car made by the us government and the union."

    I completely agree.

    "Anonymous said…
    I hope the base price comes with a loaded car. It is pathetic to price additional options and get nickeled and dimed all the way to $45k. Acura has the best pricing structure when it comes to luxury brands."

    Again, I completely agree as well.

    You can buy a fully loaded MDX which is undoubtedly nicer than the SRX and will drive better as well.

    MDX >>> SRX

  11. “Anonymous said…

    Its less car than the SRX it replaces…One year old it will be $25K…Almost worth it.”

    I don’t know if I agree with that. Have you sat in the last generation SRX? The interior materials are NOT luxury grade. Even the leather used on the seats doesn’t have a quality feel.

  12. I LOVE the CTS and plan on test driving a CTS-V. So I’m saying this as tough-love…. this looks proportioned similar to the Saturn SUV. Those side vents don’t work at all and the aggressive-but-not-aggressive front looks at odds with the bland, conventional greenhouse. The wheel design is conspicuously cheap. Finally, the gaps in the wheel wells are far too huge and gawky, which gives it the stance of a crappy Korean or Chinese SUV. This is not a luxury vehicle, no matter what logo is on the grille. And I don’t see this doing well. Sorry Caddy, better to hear this now rather than later.

  13. Strike 1: the piggy profile (a la Lexus RX) replacing the sleek, long-legged (but unloved) Sigma SRX
    Strike 2: based on a frontie chassis, which shouldn’t happen on a Cadillac of today.
    Strike 3: the GM hate in this country is at an all-time high (damn shame)

    It’s out!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *